Climate Change Project is Globalized Socialism

(source) The Riddle: What climate does climate change change?
The Answer: The political climate of course.

Let me explain. Pollution and climate change are two separate issues. Environmental pollution is a man-made problem that humans can and should remedy. Taking responsibility for our behavior is a necessary part of civilized life and eliminating environmental horrors like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is something we all need to support. So far so good.

ap_garbage_oceans_2_hb_180323_hpmain_16x9_992

Climate change, on the other hand, is a natural phenomenon that is an intrinsic part of the earth’s environmental history. For the past millions of years the natural climate on Earth has fluctuated between warm periods and ice ages in approximately 100,000 year cycles. 80-90,000 years of ice age are followed by 10-20,000 years of a warm period.

Climate change was originally called global warming but environmental politicians had to change its name because the earth was embarrassing them by cooling. A rose by any other name is still a rose and so is climate change. The cooling and warming patterns of climate change are a natural, enduring, and ongoing phenomenon.

glacials-and-interglacials-

It is absurd to insist that man is responsible for changing the earth’s climate so why does the narrative persist? Let’s find out by identifying who the the climate activists are and by determining who benefits from the narrative of man-made climate change.

Climate change is globalized socialism

Radical leftist political ideologues have taken control of legitimate environmental concerns and torqued them to promote their own agendas. The original mission of environmental groups like Greenpeace was abandoned in support of the unscientific politically motivated insistence upon man-made climate change. Greenpeace founding member Dr Patrick Moore unequivocally rejects the pseudo-science being used to support the unsupportable claims of man-made global warming and climate change.

Why do leftist politicians and environmental lobbyists continue to support their climate change narrative? Because man-made climate change is a political scheme designed to transfer the wealth of industrialized nations, particularly the United States, to non-industrialized nations. It is globalized socialism where assets of productive countries are confiscated and awarded to non-productive nations using the ruse of “saving the planet.”

Obama committed to reduction goals that would reduce the US GDP by over 2.5 trillion dollars and a shortfall of 400,000 jobs by 2035. Unsurprisingly, President Trump’s withdrawal was loudly criticized by the globalist nations seeking to diminish the manufacturing capabilities of the USA.

Enviro-socialism

The leftist Democrats recently unveiled their latest scheme to advance their man-made climate change narrative – the economy killing Green New Deal. In a scathing indictment of the plan Investor’s Business calls it enviro-socialism which describes its foundational objective perfectly. Like the Paris Climate Accord, the Green New Deal is designed to be the death knell to free-market capitalism because that is the goal of the leftist Democrats insistence upon man-made climate change.

The book “The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming” predicts there will be 100 million climate refugees by 2050. SERIOUSLY? Wallace-Wells defends his cataclysmic predictions saying that he worked from the worst warming scenario presented by the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

A stunning Forbes article published 2.5.2013 titled,  In Their Own Words: Climate Alarmists Debunk Their ‘Science’ quotes Kevin Trenberth, a lead author of 2001 and 2007 IPCC report chapters, who admits, “None of the models used by the IPCC are initialized to the observed state and none of the climate states in the models correspond even remotely to the current observed state.”

The same Forbes article quotes former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev who “emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance Marxist objectives saying, ‘The threat of environmental crisis will be the international key to unlock the New World Order.’” Gorbachev was referring, of course, to the new world order of an internationalized world community administered under the auspices of the United Nations. So, what climate does climate change change? The political climate of course.

Climate alarmism is political science masquerading as environmental science

Climate fearmongering advances the international political agenda to internationalize the world into a new world order. Climate alarmism is political science masquerading as environmental science. It is part of the despicable effort to de-industrialize the United States of America and collapse her economy.

The Green New Deal is a continuation of the redistribution of American wealth through the United Nations globalization efforts. The UN’s global man-made climate change campaign unfairly targets the United States and ignores Russia, China, and India’s non-compliance. Why? Because the goal of the deceitful campaign is to collapse America’s economy.

The RINOs are closet globalists who represent the most dangerous element in this unholy anti-American alliance because globalists consider socialism and Islamism to be temporary means to an end. The long term objective of globalism is the New World Order of one world government ruled by the globalist elite of course.

Socialism promises prosperity

and delivers poverty.

Islamism promises peace

and delivers supremacist religious tyranny.

Globalism promises both peace and prosperity

but delivers a return to feudalism

where a small ruling class has absolute power

over a world population of serfs that it rules.

7 thoughts on “Climate Change Project is Globalized Socialism

Add yours

  1. Reblogged this on The GOLDEN RULE and commented:
    Conclusion:
    ” Socialism promises prosperity and delivers poverty. Islamism promises peace and delivers supremacist religious tyranny. Globalism promises both peace and prosperity but delivers a return to feudalism where a small ruling class has absolute power over a world population of serfs that it rules. “

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Thanks for this post. Reblogged on budbromley.blog Carbon is the building block for all living cells. The ONLY way carbon enters the food chain is by absorption of CO2 from the air or water by plants for photosynthesis. Reduction of carbon and/or CO2 is essentially a death cult, a cult to reduce life on earth…all life.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. I don’t know what the “green” in AOC’s “Green New Deal” is supposed to represent. Were it not for carbon dioxide, there would be no greenery at all on earth, nor any life for that matter. CO2 is every bit as important as oxygen is to sustain life on earth.

      Liked by 4 people

  3. Reblogged this on larrysmusings and commented:
    Conspriacy theory you say?

    It does appear now that we have largely been brainwashed to accept as fact this idea of manmade global warming, now termed climate change. Who benefits from the hysteria? The Green New Deal. Give me a break. The “New Deal” of the 1930s in the US was an abysmal failure, and, if implemented, this new so-called Green New Deal would also wreck the economy in the US, and for what?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Everybody I know on the Left (fortunately there aren’t that many anymore) seems to be totally brainwashed and clueless about so-called “climate change”. OF COURSE there is climate change! In the mid-1970’s, they were predicting that that the earth was COOLING drastically and that we were about to enter a new Ice Age! WRONGO!

    But being wrong about something never seems to deter these dimwits. They seem to have no critical thinking skills, nor an ability to exhibit any humility. They just keep plodding along with one unproven, hare-brained idea after the next. And it’s getting worse and not better all the time!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Hey Stephen, I am old enough to remember that approaching Ice Age stuff in the 1976 to 1979 time period. Only a decade or so later, the chorus line had changed to one of global warming. While global cooling is more of a threat to life on the planet than warming is, and we are in an interglacial period that will one day end, neither cataclysmic warming nor cataclysmic cooling is imminent. And, let us not deceive ourselves that man can do anything about the cycles of the Sun (which were responsible for the observed warming through the early 2000s.)

      Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: